Public Policy Strategies for Reducing Informality in the Clothing Sector: Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2019.v11i2.386Keywords:
Public Policies Strategies, Informality, Multicriteria Analysis Method, Clothing Sector, Agreste PernambucanoAbstract
The goal of this study was to analyze public policies to encourage the reduction of informality in the Clothing Sector of Agreste Pernambucano, based on the multicriteria analysis method. Data from the analysis were collected through questionnaires with questions that compared the criteria (entrepreneurs with higher revenues, entrepreneurs with at least one employee and entrepreneurs involving the family in the business) and policy alternatives. Subsequently, the information collected for the application of the multi-criteria AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method of decision support was used. Among the alternatives analyzed, such as the expansion of microcredit, tax reduction and increased inspection, this research has shown that the best policy to reduce informality in the Clothing Sector of Agreste Pernambucano is the expansion of microcredit.
Downloads
References
Allen, F. Meijun, Q. & Jing, X. (2018). Understanding informal financing. Journal of Financial Intermediation, In Press.
Ashraf, J. & Uddin, S. (2016). New public management, cost savings and regressive effects: A case from a less developed country. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 41, 18-33.
Berman, E. M., West, J. P. & Richter Jr., M. N. (2002). Workplace relations: Friendship patterns and consequences (According to managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230.
Bruhn, M. & Loeprick, J. (2016). Small business tax policy and informality: evidence from Georgia. International Tax and Public Finance, 23(5), 834-853.
Cabral, R. M. (2007). Relações possíveis entre empreendedorismo, arranjos organizacionais e institucionais: Estudo de casos múltiplos no Polo de Confecções do Agreste Pernambucano. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador.
Cacciamali, M. C. (2000)Globalização e o processo de informalidade. Economia e Sociedade, 9(1), 153-174.
Cacciamali, M. C. (1983). Um estudo sobre o setor informal urbano e formas de participação na produção. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Cacciamali, M. C. et al. (1995). Crescimento econômico e geração de empregos: considerações sobre políticas públicas (IPEA). Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 12, 168-197.
Campanella, G. & Ribeiro R. A. (2011). A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 52-60.
Carvalho, H. (2012). Microeconomia facilitada: teoria e questões comentadas. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
Carvalho, C. J. & Schiozer, R. F. (2015). Determinantes da oferta e da demanda de créditos comerciais por micro, pequenas e médias empresas. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, v. 26, n. 68, p. 208-222.
Chaudhary, P. et al. (2016). Application of an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the GIS interface for suitable fire site selection: A case study from Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 53, 60-71.
Dabla-Norris, E., Gradstein, M. & Inchauste, G. (2008). What causes firms to hide output? The determinants of informality. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 1-27.
Deng, D., Wen, S., Chen, F. H. & Lin, S. Li. (2018). A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model of sustainability performance evaluation for Taiwanese Certified Public Accountant firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 603-616.
De Widt, D. & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2018). Informal networking in the public sector: Mapping local government debates in a period of austerity. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 375-388.
Demenet, A., Razafindrakoto, M. & Roubaud, F. (2016). Do informal businesses gain from registration and how? Panel data evidence from Vietnam. World Development, 84, 326-341.
Distinguin, I., Rugemintwari, C. & Tacneng, R. (2016). Can informal firms hurt registered SMEs’ access to credit?World Development, 84, 18-40.
Ehrlich, P. J. (1996). Modelos quantitativos de apoio à decisão. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 36(1).
Filártiga, G. B. (2007). Custos de transação, instituições e a cultura da informalidade no Brasil. Revista do BNDES, 14(28), 121-144.
Gomes, L. F. A. M., Araya, M. C. G. & Carignano, C. (2004). Tomada de decisões em cenários complexos. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning.
Govindan, K. et al. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.
Gray, C. & Mabey, C. (2005). Management development: Key differences between small and large businesses in Europe. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, v. 23, n. 5, 2005.
Gupta, S., Dangayacha, G. S., Singha, A. K. & Rao. P. N. (2015). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Evaluating Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Indian Electrical Panel Industries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 208-216.
Ho, W. & Ma, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399-414.
La Porta, R. & Shleifer, A. (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109-26.
Khademolqrani, S., Hamadani, A. Z. (2013). An adjusted decision support system through data mining and multiple criteria decision making. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 388-395.
Lucena, W. G. L., Vasconcelos, M. T. C. & Marcelino, G. F. (2011). A evidenciação das informações contáveis geradas pelas micro e pequenas empresas no processo decisório: Um estudo no setor de confecções. Revista de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Sustentabilidade, 1(1).
Marcesse, T. (2018). Public policy reform and informal institutions: The political articulation of the demand for work in rural India. World Development, 103, 284-296.
Macharis, C. & Bernardini, A. (2015). Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transport Policy, 37, 177-186.
Mardani, A. et al. (2015). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications: a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516-571.
Martins, M. F., Andrade, E. O. & Cândido, G. A. (2009). Caracterização e contribuição das redes informacionais para o desenvolvimento dos arranjos produtivos locais no setor de confecções do Agreste Pernambucano. Revista Gestão.Org, 7(1), 27-46.
Mitra, S. (2017). To tax or not to tax? When does it matter for informality? Economic Modelling, 64, 117-127.
Moreno-Monroy, A. I., Posada, H. M. (2018). The effect of commuting costs and transport subsidies on informality rates. Journal of Development Economics, 130, 99-112.
Motta, J. P. L., Lima, M. P. & Machado, N. M. (1993). Conflitos - Rodovia e meio ambiente: O caso da RJ 165, Paraty (RJ) – Cunha (SP). Transportes, 1(1).
Reis, M. C. & Ulyssea, G. (2005). Cunha fiscal, informalidade e crescimento: algumas questões e propostas de políticas (IPEA). Texto para Discussão, Brasília, 1068, 1-24.
Rocha, L. C. S., Mariano, A. D. & Pelogio, E. A. (2016). Diagnóstico da economia informal no município do Poço Fundo/MG. Revista de Administração em Diálogo, 18(2), 34-58.
Rothenberg, A. D. et al. (2016). Rethinking Indonesia’s informal sector. World Development, 80, 96-113.
Roy, B., Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.
Saaty, T. L. (1991). Método de análise hierárquica. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, Makron.
Santini et al. (2015). Fatores de mortalidade em micro e pequenas empresas: um estudo na região central do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 8(1), 145-169.
Singh, R. P. & Nachtnebel, H. P. (2016). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 43-58.
Soltani, A., Hewage, K., Reza, B. & Sadiq, R. (2015). Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review. Waste Management, 35, 318-32.
Sutter, C. et al. (2017). Transitioning entrepreneurs from informal to formal markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(4), 420-442.
Theodoro, M. (2000). As bases da política de apoio ao setor informal (IPEA). Texto para Discussão, Brasília, 762, 7-19.
Theodoro, M. (2002). O Estado e os diferentes enfoques sobre o informal (IPEA). Texto para Discussão, Brasília, 919, 7-21.
Williams, C. C., Shahid, M. S. & Martínez, A. (2016). Determinants of the level of informality of informal micro-enterprises: Some evidence from the city of Lahore, Pakistan. World Development, 84, 312-325.
Yager, R. R. (2018). Categorization in multi-criteria decision making. Information Sciences, 416-423.
Yassin, S. & Langot, F. (2018). Informality, public employment and employment protection in developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1), 326-348.
Yusof, N. A. M. & Salleh, S. H. (2013). Analytical Hierarchy Process in Multiple Decisions Making for Higher Education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 389-394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
