Critical factors for the adoption of social impact bonds in addressing hiv
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.796Keywords:
Social Impact Bond, HIV/AIDS Policy, Public-private partnershipAbstract
Objective: To identify the critical positive and negative factors for the adoption of the Social Impact Contract (CIS) model in actions to combat HIV in the State of Amazonas, Brazil.
Method: The research is qualitative, exploratory and descriptive. 17 semi-structured interviews were carried out with representatives of actors usually involved in a CIS: government, investors, intermediaries, Civil Society Organizations and control bodies.
Main results: The0020critical positive factors for the adoption of CIS are: testing innovative solutions to social problems with lower risk for the government; customization of solutions for specific audiences; and problem solving together with the public sector. Negative factors included lack of knowledge of the model, lack of qualifications of public managers to work with new contracting models, distrust and conflict of interests between actors, and the uncertainty of return on investment.
Relevance/originality: In Brazil, there is a lack of sources of financing for public services in the health sector and, despite the history of relations between the public and private sectors in the country, there is no Social Impact Contract (CIS) in execution.
Theoretical/methodological contributions: The study describes the perception of interest groups about CIS; demonstrates the critical positive and negative factors for the adoption of this contracting model by the health sector, especially for the treatment of HIV/AIDS.
Downloads
References
Albertson, K. et al. (2018). Payment by results and social impact bonds: Outcome-based payment systems in the UK and US. Bristol: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21h4zbp.
Arena, M. et al. (2016). Social impact bonds: Blockbuster or flash in a pan? International Journal of Public Administration, 39 (12), 927-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1057852
Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (2017). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático. São Paulo: Vozes Limitada. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552004000200016
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Vigilância, Prevenção e Controle das Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis, do HIV/Aids e das Hepatites Virais. (2021). Boletim Epidemiológico de HIV/Aids 2021. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde. http://www.aids.gov.br/pt-br/pub/2021/boletim-epidemiologico-hivaids-2021
Brasil. (1995). Plano Diretor da Reforma do Aparelho do Estado. Brasília: Câmara da Reforma do Estado.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C., & Spink, P. K. (2015). Reforma do Estado e administração pública gerencial. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Broccardo, E., Mazzuca, M., & Frigotto, M. L. (2020). Social impact bonds: The evolution of research and a review of the academic literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1316-1332. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1886
Carè, R., & De Lisa, R. (2019) Social impact bonds for a sustainable welfare state: the role of enabling factors. Sustainability, 11 (10), 2884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102884
Carè, R., Rania, F., & De Lisa, R. (2020). Critical success factors, motivations, and risks in social impact bonds. Sustainability, 12 (18), 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187291
Cerqueira, R., & Letelier, L. (2021). Contratos de impacto social: uma ferramenta de inovação para resultados sociais. Rio de Janeiro: Sitawi.
Chiapello, E. (2015). Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38 (1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9337-x
DATASUS - Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. Informações em Saúde (TABNET) - DATASUS. http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?cnes/cnv/leiintbr.def
Davidson, R., & Heap, H. (2013). Can social finance meet social need? https://issuu.com/tomorrowspeople/docs/can_social_finance_meet_social_need
Dias, R., & Matos, F. (2012). Políticas Públicas – Princípios, Propósitos e Processos. São Paulo: Atlas.
Dias, S., & Gama, A. (2019). Introdução à Investigação Qualitativa em Saúde Pública. São Paulo: Almedina.
Dowling, E. (2017). In the wake of austerity: social impact bonds and the financialisation of the welfare state in Britain. New political economy, 22 (3), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1232709
Edmiston, D., & Nicholls, A. (2018). Social Impact Bonds: The role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. Journal of Social Policy, 47 (1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279417000125
El Kadri, M. R. A. (2013). A participação das organizações da sociedade civil no enfretamento à aids: história da política no Estado do Amazonas. 94 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Saúde, Sociedade e Endemias na Amazônia) - Instituto Leônidas e Maria Deane, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Manaus.
Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M., & Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: A review of the literature on Social Impact Bonds. Social Policy & Administration, 52 (1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12260
Gama, A. S. M. et al. (2018). Inquérito de saúde em comunidades ribeirinhas do Amazonas, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 34 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00002817
Garnelo, L., Sousa, A. B. L., & Silva, C. O. (2017). Regionalização em Saúde no Amazonas: avanços e desafios. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 22 (4), 1225-1234. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017224.27082016
Gibbs, G. (2009). Análise de dados qualitativos: coleção pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Go Lab - Government Outcomes Lab. (2022). Impact Bond Dataset. https://golab.bsg.ox.ac.uk/knowledge-bank/indigo/impact-bond-dataset-v2/
Gustafsson-Wright, E. (2017). Impact bonds in developing countries: early learnings from the field. Washington DC: Brookings Centre for Universal Education.
Gustafsson-Wright, E., Gardiner, S., & Putcha, V. (2015). The potential and limitations of impact bonds: Lessons from the first five years of experience worldwide. Washington DC: Global Economy and Development at Brookings.
Hajer, J. (2019). The national governance and policy context of social impact bond emergence: A comparative analysis of leaders and skeptics. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22 (2), 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1695924
Huckfield, L. (2020). The Mythology of the Social Impact Bond. A Critical Assessment from a Concerned Observer. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 45(3), 161–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26918409
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2021). Diretoria de Pesquisas, Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais: Estimativas da população residente com data de referência 1º de julho de 2020. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
Inglesi, E. et al. (2006). Implicações do financiamento do Banco Mundial para as respostas das ONGs e OSCs ao HIV/Aids no Sul e Sudeste do Brasil. Instituto de Pesquisa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento Social. https://cdn.unrisd.org/assets/library/papers/pdf-files/inglesi-et-al-pp.pdf
Lanz, L. Q., Damasceno, P. A. M., & Macedo, R. V. Q. (2016). Títulos e garantias de impacto social: adaptação do modelo para o Brasil. Revista do BNDES. Rio de Janeiro, n. 46, 256-262. https://web.bndes.gov.br/bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/10135/1/RB_46_Titulos_e_garantias_social.pdf
Lazzarini, S. G. (2020). Contratos de Impacto Social na Rede Estadual de São Paulo: Nova Modalidade de Parceria Público-Privada no Brasil. Comentário. Education Policy Analysis Archives, v. 28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5148
Leão, L. M. (2016). Metodologia do estudo e pesquisa: facilitando a vida dos estudantes, professores e pesquisadores. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Legard, R., Keegan, J., & Ward, K. (2003). In-depth interviews. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 6 (1), 138-169. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1319
Leite, L. Q. (2019). História da reforma gerencial do Estado de 1995. Tese (Doutorado). Rio de Janeiro: FGV. https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/27464
Lowe, L., Kimmitt, J., Wilson, R., Martin, M., & Gibbon, J. (2018). The institutional work of creating and implementing Social Impact Bonds. Policy & Politics, 47(2), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15333032765154
Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2017). Social impact bonds and the perils of aligned interests. Administrative Sciences, 7 (3), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030024
Malik, A. M., & Vecina Neto, G. (2016). Gestão em Saúde. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.
Mazur, S., & Kopycinski, P. (2018). Public policy and the neo-Weberian state. London, UK: Routledge.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. California, EUA: Sage publications.
Millner, R., & Meyer, M. (2021). Collaborative governance in Social Impact Bonds: aligning interests within divergent accountabilities? Public Management Review, 24 (5), 729-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2000253
Minayo, M. C. S. (2012). Análise qualitativa: teoria, passos e fidedignidade. Ciência & saúde coletiva, 17 (3), 621-626. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300007
Neyland, D. (2018). On the transformation of children at-risk into an investment proposition: A study of Social Impact Bonds as an anti-market device. The Sociological Review, 66 (3), 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117744415
OCDE - Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2021). Estudos da OCDE sobre os Sistemas de Saúde: Brasil. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f2b7ee85-pt
OCDE - Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico. (2019). Social Impact Investment 2019: The Impact Imperative for Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311299-en
Oliveira, L. T. (2020). Política de empregabilidade de jovens desempregados e contrato de impacto social: atores, narrativas e desenho. Texto para discussão: Instituto Serzedello Corrêa. Brasília: ISC/TCU. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/biblioteca-digital/politica-de-empregabilidade-de-jovens-desempregados-e-contrato-de-impacto-social-atores-narrativas-e-desenho-8A81881E78EC66CF0179487280A6581C.htm
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1994). Reinventando o governo: como o espírito empreendedor está transformando o setor público. Brasília: Mh Comunicações.
Pinho, J. A. G. & Sacramento, A. R. S. (2015). Brazil: between the modern bureaucracy of Weber and resilient patrimonialism. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 13 (2), 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-04-2014-0548
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo–Weberian State. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Radaelli, V., Azevedo, E., & Diaz, K. (2021). Modelo apoio a Compras Públicas de Inovação. Washington, D.C: Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003277
Ribeiro, J. A., Piola, S. F., & Servo, L. M. (2007). As novas configurações de antigos problemas: financiamento e gasto com ações e serviços públicos de saúde no Brasil. Divulga Saúde Debate, 37, 21-43. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-456254
Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas.
Roy, M. J., McHugh, N., & Sinclair, S. (2017). Social impact bonds–evidence-based policy or ideology? In: Greve, B. (2017). Handbook of social policy evaluation, 263-276. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363245.00021
Saldaña J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2. ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Severino, A. J. (2017). Metodologia do trabalho científico. 2. ed. São Paulo: Cortez. https://doi.org/10.36311/2007.978-85-249-1311-2
Silva, A. O. S. (2021). Parcerias público-privadas de impacto social no Brasil: lições de tentativas inconclusas. Tese (Doutorado em Administração). Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, Faculdade Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo. https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/31130
Silva, L. F., & Russo, R. F. S. M. (2019). Aplicação de entrevistas em pesquisa qualitativa. Gestão e Projetos: GeP, 10 (1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v10i1.13285
Sitawi – Finanças do Bem. (2019). Relatório anual 2018. Rio de Janeiro: Sitawi.
Stanworth, N. (2020). In depth review: the Zero HIV Social Impact Bond. ATQ Consultants. Relatório técnico. https://www.tnlcommunityfund.org.uk/media/insights/documents/EJAF-Zero-HIV-in-depth-review_FINAL.pdf?mtime=20201130131429&focal=none
Tan, S. et al. (2015). An evaluation of social impact bonds in health and social care: interim report. London: Policy Innovation Research Unit (PIRU).
Tortorice, D. L. et al. (2020). A Theory of Social Impact Bonds. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27527
Warner, M. E. (2013). Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of economic policy reform, 16 (4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Porto Alegre: Penso.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Henrique Soares Carvalho, Graziella Maria Comini, Ana Luiza Terra Costa Mathias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
